Who didn’t see that coming?

Laws are just for the peons.

Think we’ll see a warrant for his arrest?

Yeah,me neither.

Keep it up.You’re doing a great job of destroying your own legitimacy.

Fed.gov,that is…


It appears that the judge issued a default judgement against Obama because he didn’t bother to show or send a lawyer.

More details here.



Filed under Uncategorized

8 responses to “Who didn’t see that coming?

  1. UNeverKnow

    In reading the comments below it saddens me to no end that the people of the US cannot get passed the fact the we have an african american president. Furthermore, at what point are you going to realize how stupid you look to the rest of the world. Do none of you understand the meaning of ‘united we stand, divided we fall’? All the division displayed just lets the rest of the world know that we are a weak nation at heart and how to you conquer a weak nation, make the people fight amongst themselves. they’ll destroy each other.

    why can’t these racist let this go. It’s been proven over and over and over again – I guess nothing this great man does is good enough yet they defend the GOP ‘hero’s who are proven liars, cheaters and frauds over a true Family Values guy, which actually give more insight into the bigots than anything else. President Obama has no business to go.

    The whole birther movement is racist to the core.

    • This issue could have been resolved by this “great man” long ago by simply providing legal documentary evidence that would end the debate.

      Instead,all we have received is stonewalling,obfuscations,and diversions of the real issue.

      This has nothing to do with race,despite your attempts to make it appear that it is.This has everything to do with the rule of law,and his Constitutional eligibility for the office that he currently occupies.

    • Upon further consideration,I believe the comment left by UNeverKnow is spam left by an Obot troll based upon the first sentence containing “the comments below”.
      He was only the second comment,and the first contained only 4 words total.
      I will leave it up as an object example of what passes for intellectual honesty these days.
      What say you?

    • In this case… the issue is HE IS A HARVARD EDUCATED lawyer. He should KNOW the law. His WIFE should know the law!

      It is not about race, birth place, birth date. It is about deceit, lies and URINATING on the Constitution each and every day he is in the White House.

      Anyone saying that is racist… needs to spend ten years in Iraq and other hell holes trying to promote democracy.

  2. Well, anyway I’ll post what I was starting to do at any rate.

    The problem with him, useful idiot, is that he is a Collectivist. You know, he likes control as in Naziism, Communism and Marxism.

    “And Now, After Sending Our Best Young Men To Die On distant battlefields fighting Communism, we may simply vote a Marxist into our highest office.”
    23 July 2008
    10/’67 – 5/’69 USARV, 6/’69 – 09/’71 OICC/RVN+, 06/’73 – 25/04/’75 DAO, US Embassy RVN

  3. Gordo

    Playing the race card again… America is such mess. People used to have a back bone decades ago. They were strong willed, had conviction and dignity. Now people are just mush with no self identity, no self respect. Just a ball of feelings and emotions with no critical thinking. Children they are. Social engineering is to blame. It was all by design.

    Regarding Obama, the problem with him is had be been forthright from the beginning then all of this birther nonsense would have gone away. But instead he acted as if he had something to hide and therefore aroused more suspicion. Looking at the evidence, Obama is most likely a fraud and certainly not qualified to be POTUS.

    What is amazing is how rational human beings could support an illegal usurper and defend him. It’s beyond words.

  4. Bill Cleveland

    First off, this is not about citizenship. Obama is an American citizen, The issue is Obama is a dual citizen; Kenyan/British and American by birth.
    Several Supreme Court rulings have established that dual citizens can not hold the Presidential office in the U.S. The lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined “natural-born citizen” as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant to his citizenship. This is about the guarantee that anyone that might run for a the Presidential office will not have conflicting national loyalties.

    Among others, the U.S. Supreme Court opinion cited is Minor v. Happersett from 1875. It includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.

    That case states:

    “The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

    The White House has not addressed the questions raised by Obama’s father’s nationality.